HiringAgent vs a traditional ATS.
A traditional ATS tracks the applicants who find you. HiringAgent tracks them too — and also goes out and finds candidates, scores them and runs the first screen.
Side by side
- Tracks candidates through stages: HiringAgent — yes; Traditional ATS — yes
- Sources candidates from a job description: HiringAgent — yes; Traditional ATS — Often an add-on
- AI match score on every candidate: HiringAgent — yes; Traditional ATS — Varies
- AI phone screens: HiringAgent — yes; Traditional ATS — no
- Posts to job boards: HiringAgent — no; Traditional ATS — yes
- Custom stages and integrations: HiringAgent — no; Traditional ATS — yes
- Offer letters and e-signature: HiringAgent — no; Traditional ATS — Often
Choose a traditional ATS if
- Most of your candidates come from job boards
- You need custom stages, offer letters or HRIS integrations
- You have compliance workflows such as EEO reporting
Choose HiringAgent if
- You need candidates found, not just tracked
- You want every candidate scored against the role
- You want first-round screens to run without scheduling
Questions
- Is HiringAgent a full ATS? It covers sourcing, applicants, stages from applicant to hired, a candidate pool and reports. It does not post to job boards, integrate with HR systems or send offer letters.
- Can I use both? Yes. Source and screen in HiringAgent, and export candidates to CSV for your ATS.
About HiringAgent
HiringAgent, by Agent360, is AI candidate sourcing and a modern applicant tracking system (ATS) in one: paste a job description and its agents source candidates, score each 0–100 against the role, run AI phone screens and track everyone from applicant to hired, set up with our team. Plans start at $197 a month with unlimited users, month to month.
