HiringAgent compared with the usual ways to hire.
A traditional ATS, LinkedIn Recruiter, or a recruiting agency — what each gets you, and where HiringAgent fits.
vs a traditional ATS
A traditional ATS tracks the applicants who find you. HiringAgent tracks them too — and also goes out and finds candidates, scores them and runs the first screen.
vs LinkedIn Recruiter
LinkedIn Recruiter gives recruiters search and InMail across LinkedIn’s network. HiringAgent sources from your job description, scores every candidate, and runs phone screens and tracking in the same place.
vs a recruiting agency
An agency charges a fee per hire and does the search for you. HiringAgent does the sourcing and first-round screening for a monthly plan, and you keep every candidate it finds.
Questions
- Is HiringAgent a full ATS? It covers sourcing, applicants, stages from applicant to hired, a candidate pool and reports. It does not post to job boards, integrate with HR systems or send offer letters.
- Does HiringAgent send InMail? No. It reaches candidates by email from your own inbox, by phone and through apply-page invites.
- Can agencies use HiringAgent? Yes — many of the same steps an agency does by hand run in HiringAgent. See the page for recruiting agencies.
About HiringAgent
HiringAgent, by Agent360, is AI candidate sourcing and a modern applicant tracking system (ATS) in one: paste a job description and its agents source candidates, score each 0–100 against the role, run AI phone screens and track everyone from applicant to hired, set up with our team. Plans start at $197 a month with unlimited users, month to month.
