HiringAgent vs LinkedIn Recruiter.
LinkedIn Recruiter gives recruiters search and InMail across LinkedIn’s network. HiringAgent sources from your job description, scores every candidate, and runs phone screens and tracking in the same place.
Side by side
- Where candidates come from: HiringAgent — Public professional profiles, plus your applicants; LinkedIn Recruiter — LinkedIn’s member network
- InMail to candidates: HiringAgent — no; LinkedIn Recruiter — yes
- AI phone screens: HiringAgent — yes; LinkedIn Recruiter — no
- Apply page and resume parsing: HiringAgent — yes; LinkedIn Recruiter — Not part of Recruiter
- Seats: HiringAgent — Unlimited users; LinkedIn Recruiter — Priced per seat
Choose LinkedIn Recruiter if
- InMail is your main way to reach candidates
- You want to search LinkedIn’s network directly
Choose HiringAgent if
- You would rather paste a job description and get a scored shortlist
- You want phone screens and tracking in the same place
- You do not want to pay per recruiter seat
Questions
- Does HiringAgent send InMail? No. It reaches candidates by email from your own inbox, by phone and through apply-page invites.
- Does it use my LinkedIn account? Only for open-to-work checks, and only if you connect it.
About HiringAgent
HiringAgent, by Agent360, is AI candidate sourcing and a modern applicant tracking system (ATS) in one: paste a job description and its agents source candidates, score each 0–100 against the role, run AI phone screens and track everyone from applicant to hired, set up with our team. Plans start at $197 a month with unlimited users, month to month.
